CISA Issues Advisory on Mitigating Risks Originating from Tor

Date:

Share post:

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in the U.S. issued security guidelines on how to  mitigate cyber risks  originating from anonymity networks like Tor. In collaboration with the FBI, CISA released an advisory explaining how attackers use Tor’s network infrastructure.

Tor, also known as the Onion Router, is a software that provides user anonymity by automatically encrypting and rerouting web requests through multiple layers of Tor nodes. Threat actors often use Tor services to hide their identity and IP locations when performing malicious activities.

“The risk of being the target of malicious activity routed through Tor is unique to each organization. An organization should determine its individual risk by assessing the likelihood that a threat actor will target its systems or data and the probability of the threat actor’s success given current mitigations and controls. This assessment should consider legitimate reasons that non-malicious users may prefer to, or need to, use Tor for accessing the network. Organizations should evaluate their mitigation decisions against threats to their organization from advanced persistent threats (APTs), moderately sophisticated attackers, and low-skilled individual hackers, all of whom have leveraged Tor to carry out reconnaissance and attacks in the past,” the advisory said.

Image Source: US-Cert.Gov

Security Guidelines

CISA recommended certain protective measures for organizations to reduce the risk posed by threat actors who use Tor. These include:

  • Block all web traffic to and from public Tor entry and exit nodes. (It does not completely eliminate the threat of malicious actors using Tor for anonymity, as additional Tor network access points, or bridges, are not all listed publicly.)
  • Tailor monitoring, analysis, and blocking of web traffic to and from public Tor entry and exit nodes: orgs that do not wish to block legitimate traffic to/from Tor entry/exit nodes should consider adopting practices that allow for network monitoring and traffic analysis for traffic from those nodes, and then consider appropriate blocking. This approach can be resource-intensive but will allow greater flexibility and adaptation of defensive.
  • Block all Tor traffic to some resources, allow and monitor for others. This may require continuous re-evaluation as an entity considers its own risk tolerance associated with different applications. The level of effort to implement this approach is high.

Subscribe

Name(Required)
Privacy(Required)

Upcoming Events

Related articles

Who Do We Fire When the Agent Gets It Wrong? Inside the Agentic AI SOC

By Jeremy Hehl Agents can triage, enrich and correlate at machine speed. But someone still has to own the...

Cyber Insurance Is No Longer Optional: In the Age of AI-Driven Threats, Can Your Business Afford the Risk of Being Unprotected?

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff | EC-Council It comes down to one number: what your worst incident would...

Why AI Governance Is Becoming Cyber Insurance’s Next MFA

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff to CEO at EC-Council I set out to understand why companies still don’t...

What the Nuclear Treaty Got Right, and Why AI Still Can’t Use It

By Jay Bavisi, Founder & Group President, EC-Council Nuclear treaties stopped bombs. They don't stop a file you can...