Home Interviews “You can’t quantify business risk with RAG color coded scores”

“You can’t quantify business risk with RAG color coded scores”

quantify business risk, Adam Palmer, Chief Cybersecurity Strategist, Tenable

A recent study by Forrester Research shows that 97% of Indian organizations experienced at least one business-impacting cyberattack in the past 12 months. Yet, only four in 10 security leaders in India have a clear picture of how much at risk, or how secure their organizations are. In a chat with CISO MAG, Adam Palmer, Chief Cybersecurity Strategist at Tenable, tells us how security leaders should quantify business risk and assess the attack surface, using accurate and more insightful metrics like the cyber exposure score.

Palmer has over 20 years of cybersecurity experience.  That includes executive positions at large cybersecurity vendors, leading the U.N. Global Program against cybercrime.  Before joining Tenable, Palmer held the position of Global Director, cybersecurity Risk & Controls for Banco Santander – the largest bank in the EU and Latin America.

Palmer began his career as a U.S. military officer focused on cybercrime cases.  After the military, he worked in a senior operational role by creating the [.]ORG top-level Internet domain cybersecurity program.

Edited excerpts of the interview:

By Brian Pereira, Principal Editor, CISO MAG

Your research shows that only 4 in 10 security leaders know how secure or at risk they are. How does an organization quantify business risk due to these business-impacting cyber attacks? Are there any frameworks or tools to do this?

I worked on this idea for two years and my prior job at the bank (Banco Santander) was trying to quantify risk — moving from qualitative to quantifiable analysis. Many security leaders use the heat matrices, the red, amber, green (RAG) scores to try to describe risk to the business leaders. This is really IT talk. Every organization I worked at did this. It doesn’t say anything to really quantify the risk or help people understand the reduction in risk. How can a business leader make a decision based on a color in RAG scores? There is a gap in communication between how IT people speak (technical or ambiguous), and the expectations of business leaders — quantitative understanding of risk.

A cyber exposure score, which is what Tenable creates, is a powerful tool because it gives you a quantifiable number.

Why haven’t security leaders been able to do accurate risk assessments for business-impacting cyberattacks?

The heart of it is really the lack of partnership between the security and the business leaders. There’s not enough alignment of metrics and objectives with business strategic priorities. I see that organizations report risk in a very qualitative language. This is not the language of business leaders. They have to consider industry benchmarking frameworks and accurately report it to the business, especially in times like today.

Organizations with security and business leaders who are aligned in measuring and managing cybersecurity as a strategic business risk deliver demonstrable results. What would be your recommendations to security leaders to do this security-business alignment? How do they weave cybersecurity into the fabric of business discussions?

The keys are a few things: linking the security program to business performance.  Making sure you have visibility across the entire attack surface. The attack surface has expanded with cloud and even operational technology. You can’t protect what you can’t see. And you have to apply a business context to your tactical decisions and express that in a quantifiable matrix that business leaders understand.

Looking at the global threat landscape, which countries are being targeted the most? And what could be the reasons?

We saw that all the markets had a high percentage of business-impacting events over the last 12 months. 97% of businesses in India reported a cyberattack within the last 12 months. And 74% expect an increase in cyberattacks. Today, we are in a very dynamic business environment, with business and technology closely woven together. The effective business-aligned CISO just can’t focus on technical issues or one part of that threat landscape. They really have to be aligned with the business and elevate themselves as a business-aligned security expert — and be aware of the entire expanded threat landscape.

Specific to India, what does your research show, with respect to the types of businesses being increasingly targeted?

We saw medium and large businesses being attacked. We know that these businesses make India a dynamic and exciting economy, with Digital India, and all the technology being used throughout India – in business and in government. Cybercriminals know where the money is, and they target technology and intellectual property. Given the monetary value and the damage that can be caused by a successful attack, across industries, telecom, health care, finance, all these industries are major targets. And what we found in this study is that all of these are equal opportunity targets for cybercriminals to attack a business.

Your research shows that 67% of security leaders in India say these attacks also involved an operational technology (OT) system. What kind of industries are being targeted within India? Does this also include critical infrastructures like nuclear plants and electricity grids?

This is really an issue of convergence. Automation is now common in the industrial environment. And that environment is converging with the IT environment. It is in critical infrastructure and manufacturing. But it can be in lots of different types of businesses. Think about automated access controls, with all kinds of smart connected devices, HVAC — some of these use smart connected industrial controllers. And we are finding that cybercriminals are attacking these devices and often, security teams aren’t monitoring these satisfactorily. They are using legacy approaches for vulnerability risk management, and they are not detecting these devices. And the criminals are attacking them.

A heavy manufacturing plant that uses OT devices, was targeted last year in Europe. And it cost Euro 40 million in the first week.  It disabled their operations. So it is critical that the security teams secure these critical operations and make sure they are using the same amount of analysis and care that they apply to other amounts of threats and that they are applying that as well to this new threat vector, which is OT.

I want to talk about the COVID-19 response strategies, and you have another data point in your report about this: 75% of the respondents say their COVID-19 strategies are somewhat aligned to the business. What is the reason for the surge in COVID-19 related phishing attacks on businesses?

Cybersecurity threats really thrive amidst a climate of uncertainty. We’ve seen attacks increase with attackers taking advantage of the current pandemic environment. This highlights the fact that cybersecurity should be a board-level concern. In times of crisis, it’s more important that you have clarity and alignment with the business. Cybersecurity teams need to evolve to align themselves to a business strategy that understands this, connects with this, and manage cyber risk, in relation to the world around them, which is now an unusual world due to COVID-19.