Marriott International Slapped with $123 Mn GDPR Fine for 2014 Data Breach

Date:

Share post:

The U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) imposed £18.4 million ($23.92 million) fine on Marriott International Inc. for violating the GDPR guidelines. The data privacy regulator stated that Marriott has failed to protect the personal data of millions of its customers. Around 339 million guest records worldwide were affected after a cyberattack on Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Inc. in 2014, remained undetected until September 2018, by when the company had been acquired by Marriott.

Attack Background

In 2014, an unknown attacker installed a malware code in the Starwood systems to obtain access to the contents remotely. With unrestricted access to the infected device, attackers distributed malware to other devices on the network to steal customers’ sensitive information. The exposed information included names, email addresses, unencrypted passport numbers, phone numbers, arrival/departure information, guests’ VIP status, and loyalty program membership number.

Related Story: Four Biggest GDPR Fines of 2020

Violation Penalty

The ICO’s investigation found that Marriott failed to put appropriate security measures to protect its customers’ data being processed on its systems, as per the GDPR.

In July 2019, the ICO issued Marriott with a notice of intent to fine up to £99,200,396 ($123 million) for violating the data breach regulations. However, the regulator decreased the penalty amount considering the economic impact of COVID-19 on their business.

Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham said, “Personal data is precious, and businesses have to look after it. Millions of people’s data was affected by Marriott’s failure; thousands contacted a helpline and others may have had to take action to protect their personal data because the company they trusted it with had not. When a business fails to look after customers’ data, the impact is not just a possible fine, what matters most is the public whose data they had a duty to protect.”

Related Story: Marriott International faces $123 million GDPR fine

Subscribe

Name(Required)
Privacy(Required)

Upcoming Events

Related articles

To Patch or Not to Patch: Chris Roberts Takes Shakespeare to Hacker Halted 2026

Holding a skull and reading AI-written soliloquies, the veteran hacker and "recovering CISO" argued that the threats change...

Who Do We Fire When the Agent Gets It Wrong? Inside the Agentic AI SOC

By Jeremy Hehl Agents can triage, enrich and correlate at machine speed. But someone still has to own the...

Cyber Insurance Is No Longer Optional: In the Age of AI-Driven Threats, Can Your Business Afford the Risk of Being Unprotected?

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff | EC-Council It comes down to one number: what your worst incident would...

Why AI Governance Is Becoming Cyber Insurance’s Next MFA

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff to CEO at EC-Council I set out to understand why companies still don’t...