JhoneRAT Malware Attacks Middle East Countries

Date:

Share post:

Security researchers from Cisco Talos recently discovered a new version of remote access trojan (RAT), which attacks a victim’s device via malicious Microsoft Office documents. The RAT malware, tracked as “JhoneRAT”, was developed using Python and targeted a set of Middle East countries by checking keyboard layouts of the infected devices.

The researchers identified three malicious MS Office documents that were used to infect the device.  The first document “Urgent.docx”, discovered in November 2019, asks the victim to enable English and Arabic-language editing.  The second document named “fb.docx”, discovered in January 2020, claims to contain data on leaked Facebook accounts from 2019. The third document, found at the end of January 2020, contains blurred content and is alleged to be from a legitimate United Arab Emirates organization. 

How JhoneRAT Works

Attackers trick the victims to click and download a malicious document from the internet. The malware then gets divided into multiple layers and each layer downloads a new malware payload. Once JhoneRAT is deployed, it gathers information from the victim’s cloud services like Google Drive, Twitter, ImgBB, and Google Forms.

Countries Attacked

According to the researchers, JhoneRAT targeted UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Oman, Yemen, Syria, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Lebanon.

How to Prevent JhoneRAT

Hackers try to lure their victims into opening malicious documents by labeling it as “Urgent.docx” or “fb.docx” or other strange image files. It’s advised to avoid clicking such file extensions from unknown sources.

“The fact that this attacker decided to leverage cloud services and four different services—and not their own infrastructure—is smart from an opsec point of view. It is hard for the targets to identify legitimate and malicious traffic to cloud provider infrastructure. Moreover, this kind of infrastructure uses HTTPS and the flow is encrypted that makes man-in-the-middle interception more complicated for the defender. It is not the first time an attacker used only cloud providers,” the researchers said.

Subscribe

Name(Required)
Privacy(Required)

Upcoming Events

Related articles

To Patch or Not to Patch: Chris Roberts Takes Shakespeare to Hacker Halted 2026

Holding a skull and reading AI-written soliloquies, the veteran hacker and "recovering CISO" argued that the threats change...

Who Do We Fire When the Agent Gets It Wrong? Inside the Agentic AI SOC

By Jeremy Hehl Agents can triage, enrich and correlate at machine speed. But someone still has to own the...

Cyber Insurance Is No Longer Optional: In the Age of AI-Driven Threats, Can Your Business Afford the Risk of Being Unprotected?

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff | EC-Council It comes down to one number: what your worst incident would...

Why AI Governance Is Becoming Cyber Insurance’s Next MFA

By Kareena Bavisi, Chief of Staff to CEO at EC-Council I set out to understand why companies still don’t...